Placenta Research Attracts $41.5 Million in Federal Funding

An NIH project seeks to develop technologies to help monitor the organ in real time

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The placenta that supports a fetus for nine months is thrown away after birth, but its influence on health lasts a lifetime.

Now, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) is launching a major effort to unlock the mysteries of this poorly understood organ. The US$41.5-million Human Placenta Project (HPP), announced on February 26, seeks to fund the development of new technologies to help researchers to monitor the placenta in real time. These could include everything from tests to detect fetal DNA in a mother's blood to artificial placentas-on-chips.

“The human placenta is clearly critically important—I wouldn’t be here if I hadn’t had one,” says Catherine Spong, deputy director of the National Institute of Child Health and Development, which is one of two NIH institutes funding the project.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But it is difficult to study the organ in action. Animal models are of limited use because each mammal species has a unique process for placental development. And researchers can obtain a human placenta only after a baby has been delivered, at which point the organ is no longer functional.

Improved imaging
Techniques such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging offer physicians a restricted view of the placenta in people, and the methods are generally too crude to identify problems early enough for clinicians to intervene, says Yoel Sadovsky, an obstetrician–gynaecologist at the Magee-Womens Research Institute in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

If the NIH effort is successful, obstetricians and researchers will be able to monitor the placenta in real time, as a proxy for monitoring fetal health. Spong says that the project is similar in thrust to the US government’s Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies initiative, in that it seeks to develop new technologies to enable scientific advances.

Each proposal for the NIH programme must include a clinical obstetrician, who can ensure that the new technologies are useful for modern clinics, and a placental-biology expert. But the best ideas could come from engineers, radiologists and other interdisciplinary experts who join the teams, says Spong. The money will be split between eight or nine projects, each of which will be funded for four years.

Up to $39 million of the effort’s large budget comes from money that had been set aside for the NIH’s National Children’s Study, a $150 million effort that was to study the health of 100,000 children over decades, but was cancelled in December.

At a meeting in Potomac, Maryland, last May, researchers hoping to participate in the HPP presented a range of ideas for monitoring systems. Many seek to develop imaging techniques, such as those using nanoparticles that could cross from the mother’s circulatory system into the placenta and deliver markers that would be visible on a scan. Other researchers hope to capitalize on recent research showing that a pregnant mother’s blood contains cells, bits of DNA, and other materials sloughed off from the placenta, which could provide markers for fetal health.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on February 27, 2015.

Sara Reardon is a freelance biomedical journalist based in Bozeman, Mont. She is a former staff reporter at Nature, New Scientist and Science and has a master’s degree in molecular biology.

More by Sara Reardon

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe