Planet-forming Disks Slow Down Spinning Stars

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Astronomers have finally found evidence that the rotation of young, whirling stars is slowed down by the planet-forming disks surrounding them. New data from NASA¿s Spitzer Space Telescope support the hypothesis that protoplanetary disks absorb some of a young star¿s angular momentum, which, if left unchecked, would cause the star to spin so fast it would fly apart under its own inertia. Scientists have believed for decades that planetary disks were probably responsible for slowing down spinning stars but until now observations did not clearly support the idea.

¿We had a really nice theoretical model in the nineties and some of the data seemed to support it, but the more data we got, the muddier the waters became,¿ says Luisa Rebull of NASA's Spitzer Science Center in Pasadena, Calif., lead author of the paper that appeared in The Astrophysical Journal July 20. The model was based on the fact that as a large cloud of gas and debris begins contracting under its own gravity, conservation of angular momentum dictates that it will rotate faster and faster as it shrinks, much like a spinning skater who pulls in her arms in order to twirl at top speed. These infant stars eventually spin so fast that any excess gas and dust is flattened into a pancakelike disk around the star, which may eventually yield planets. Although all stars are thought to form these protoplanetary disks, for unknown reasons some disks remain prominent and others become smaller or nearly disappear. Because a disk is composed of ionized gas and dust, a spinning star¿s magnetic field gets caught up in it and the result is ¿like a spoon being dragged through molasses,¿ Rebull says. Angular momentum is transferred to the disk and the star rotates more slowly, with a much greater effect seen in stars with larger disks.

¿It was too good a solution to let go,¿ says Rebull, who has been working on this problem for over a decade. Until now, observations have yielded mixed results--only some of the data supported the theory--and all the observations suffered from small sample sizes and the inaccuracies inherent in using optical telescopes to determine which young stars had prominent disks. Finally, the launch of Spitzer in August 2003 meant astronomers could readily identify these large disks; they are heated by the stars and give off infrared light in the frequencies Spitzer is designed to detect. Rebull examined nearly 500 stars in the Orion Nebula and found that slowly spinning stars were five times more likely to have prominent disks than fast spinners. ¿This is the clearest evidence yet that indeed the disks are where the angular momentum is going,¿ says Rebull. ¿It¿s very encouraging that we¿re on the right track.¿

About Karen Schrock

Kate Schrock has been an editor of Scientific American MIND since 2007, where she edits feature articles and runs Head Lines, the magazine's news department. After studying astronomy and physics at the University of Southern California, she worked in the Laboratory of Neuro Imaging at the University of California, Los Angeles, studying the brain structure of people with schizophrenia. She then enrolled in the Science, Health and Environmental Reporting program at New York University, where she earned a master's degree in journalism.

More by Karen Schrock

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe