Playgrounds Are Not All Created Equally

The type of school yard affects how much children exercise

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Kids should exercise at least one hour a day, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But in the U.S., less than half of six- to 11-year-olds and only 8 percent of 12- to 19-year-olds meet that target. Schools help to promote physical activity, with recess accounting for up to 40 percent of a child's daily exercise needs. So how exactly do kids spend that welcome break from their desks?

Over in Denmark, a longitudinal study of how schoolchildren move through urban environments provided an opportunity to find out by outfitting hundreds of students with accelerometers and GPS trackers during their waking hours. Henriette Bondo Andersen, a research assistant in the department of sports science and clinical biomechanics at the University of Southern Denmark, used some of the collected data to analyze how children spent their recess time and whether various school yards—including those made up of grassy areas, playgrounds or asphalt lots—influenced activity levels.

The researchers found that children were significantly more active when playing on grassy areas and at sites featuring playground equipment. Concrete lots elicited the least energy expenditure, and in all five areas studied, girls spent more time being sedentary than boys. The findings (below) were published this month in Landscape and Urban Planning.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Insights into which schoolyard elements work best to promote physical activity could help developers around the world create more exercise-friendly spaces. “We're working with seven schools that are renovating their playgrounds by adding dancing, climbing, skating and trampoline areas,” Andersen says. “The goal is to make it so kids can more easily choose to be active.”

Scientific American Magazine Vol 312 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Fit for Play” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 312 No. 2 (), p. 24
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0215-24

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe