Pluto's Moon Charon Faces Competition from a New Kuiper Belt Object

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In recent years, scientists have debated whether or not they should demote tiny Pluto from full-fledged planet status to mere "Transneptunian Object." Its fate remains to be seen. But now Pluto's only moon, Charon, faces a challenge of its own: researchers have found a new space rock that threatens to take the satellite's place as the second-largest object in the outer fringes of our solar system, a region referred to as the Kuiper Belt.

Astronomers from Lowell Observatory, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Large Binocular Telescope Observatory spotted Charon's icy rival, a planetary body they dubbed 2001 KX76, on May 22, 2001. "This object is intrinsically the brightest Kuiper Belt Object (KBO) found so far," says Robert Millis, director of Lowell Observatory. The team used albedo¿or the fraction of sunlight reflected, in this case, by 2001 KX76¿to approximate its size. Even the most conservative estimates suggest that 2001 KX76 is about 1,270 kilometers in diameter, or larger than Charon by at least 5 percent, Millis says.

Astronomers have discovered about 400 KBOs since 1992, when they detected the first. The new object orbits the sun in a plane tilted 20 degrees from that of the major planets. Researchers presume 2001 KX76's orbit is linked to Neptune's orbit; the KBO makes three trips around the sun for every four the planet makes. "2001 KX76 is so exciting because it demonstrates that significant bodies remain to be discovered in the Kuiper Belt," Millis adds. "We have every reason to believe that objects ranging up to planets as large or larger than Pluto are out there waiting to be found." Poor Pluto.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe