New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Poem: ‘Elective Affinities: Ghazal of the Muon’

Science in meter and verse

NOTE: A ghazal (pronounced “guzzle”) is an ancient Arabic poetic form that usually treats a theme of love or loss. Each couplet in a ghazal ends with the same word or phrase.

Yuichiro Chino/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Edited by Dava Sobel

Elective Affinities: Ghazal of the Muon
“Long-Awaited Muon Measurement Boosts Evidence for New Physics”
— Scientific American, April 7, 2021

The Muon’s aberrant behavior, an extended quantum particle wobble,
upends the Standard Theory, creating in Physics an existential wobble.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Normally a wavelike excitation, spinning through Higgs’s gravitational field, unless
caught and entangled in a moment of viable wobble,

endowed with inertia and mass by its fellow particles’ embrace—a short-
lived liaison, alas, for it soon dissipates in an unavoidable wobble.

Mathematical equations calculate how long the Muon dance goes on,
what fraction of a millisecond until its final metaphysical wobble.

The calculations are precise, just wrong. Held in the mesh of gravity and spin, a skein of
quantum magnetic charge, the Muon persists, outlives its foreseeable wobble.

In the pull and twitch of particle affinities—knitting and purling the fabric of the universe—
something has not been accounted for that prolongs the Muon’s mortal wobble.

This flouting of what we think we know requires us to think again, to ponder what unknown
matter, lepton, quark or boson explains the Muon’s extendable wobble.

The enigma entwines us all. In our own life’s brief entanglement, anchored between infinities
small and large, we, too, hover, then fade, in a final fatal wobble.

Do we then spin on, subatomized, in the quantum particle soup? Does
immortality in fact exist in the blips of an electromagnetic celestial wobble?

Despite a childhood determination to become a biophysicist writing novels on the side, Judith K. Liebmann earned a Ph.D. in comparative literature at Yale University and became a poet. Her work has appeared in the journals Cream City Review, the Laurel Review and Orim, as well as in the New York Times.

More by Judith K. Liebmann
Scientific American Magazine Vol 326 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Elective Affinities: Ghazal of the Muon” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 326 No. 2 (), p. 24
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0222-24

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe