New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Poem: ‘How I Became a Spitfire Pilot during My Cataract Operation’

Science in meter and verse

Illustration of an eye with planes passing in front of the iris.

Masha Foya

For Lawrence J. Geisse, M.D.

Entering the operating theater,
 I climbed onto the gurney
resting my head
      on the mock headrest

a geisha dreaming
 on a woodblock.
The whine of the machine’s descent
            distracted me


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


the crosshairs locking in
 on its target
finding myself a fighter pilot
          inside a cockpit canopy.

An exhale of pressure,
 slight as a concubine
kissing an eyelid,
      followed by an ultrasound impact.

My lens spidered, a shattered windshield,
 each fragment of the cataract
dutifully vacuumed
       just as Dr. Ridley

tweezered the splinters of plexiglass
 from the Spitfire pilot’s eyes,
an ace returning from the European theater
               of operations.

The lack of infection
 sparked Ridley’s mind, the man who
would unmask the blind with his invention
               a plastic lens

uncurling inside the eye
 for all to see.

English ophthalmologist Harold Ridley, driven by the need to treat the novel injuries of World War II fighter pilots, pioneered the 1949 solution that earned him global recognition as “father of the intraocular lens.”

Roger Camp of Seal Beach, Calif., is a poet, blues pianist, photographer and orchid enthusiast. When he’s not at home, he’s photographing in the Old World. His work has appeared in Spillway, Slant, North American Review, Pank, Southern Poetry Review and Nimrod.

More by Roger Camp
Scientific American Magazine Vol 334 Issue 5This article was published with the title “How I Became a Spitfire Pilot during My Cataract Operation” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 334 No. 5 (), p. 91
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican052026-018SEJjUKWu5j9cvz5lS7a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe