4 Companies You Love to Hate: Apple, Microsoft, Google and Facebook

The reasons why, and some reasons why it might be worth cooling our collective jets about them

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In my March column, I explored why tech gadget firms draw such rabid partisanship. Certainly, in the gadget flame wars, there’s something for everyone these days. Here’s an assessment of the latest companies people love to hate.

Apple is Evil. The haters’ beef: Apple stuff is too expensive. Apple is a totalitarian control freak that limits what we can do with our gadgets. Apple is smug and elitist.

Yeah, but: So why the rage? Why isn’t there equivalent rage toward other companies that sell expensive, stylish goods, like BMW or Bang & Olufsen? Why not just not buy Apple stuff if you find it so offensive—why is it also necessary to denigrate people who do?

Microsoft is Evil. The haters’ beef: Microsoft owns the computer desktop without having any ideas of its own. Bill Gates didn’t write the DOS operating system—he bought it and rode it to incredible wealth. And everything else Microsoft has ever sold—Windows, Zune, Pocket PC, XBox, Internet Explorer—was built on stolen ideas.

Yeah, but: There are alternatives to everything Microsoft sells—nobody’s holding a gun to your head and insisting that you use Windows or Office. Besides, Microsoft doesn’t always play me-too. The Kinect is all its own. So were Smart Displays and the Spot Watch. (Yeah, they flopped, but they weren’t copycats.) Windows Phone 7 is a copycat concept—it’s an iPhone wannabe—but its design is totally fresh.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Google is Evil. The haters’ beef: Google is too big, too powerful. It has access to all of our phone calls (Google Voice), email (Gmail), mobile transactions (Android) and Web activities (Google search). The people behind Google are reading our private transactions—how else could they display ads appropriate to what’s in our email and Web searches?

Yeah, but: There’s never been any evidence that Google humans are, in fact, snooping through our stuff. And if you’re going to worry about Google intercepting your communications, why aren’t you also worried about all of its rivals—Yahoo, Microsoft and so on?

Facebook is Evil. The haters’ beef: Facebook now stores the personal data of over half a billion people—all within the hands of a 26-year-old college dropout with no adult supervision. Facebook is a privacy disaster; it’s selling our information to advertisers, sometimes in sleazy ways without our permission.

Yeah, but: Um, how did Facebook get your personal information? You supplied it. You expected to reap the pleasures of a global directory, so old friends and new ones can find you. If that concept gives you the heebies, why sign up?

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe