New Gadget Too Complicated? Try “Easy Mode”

Hidden menus transform complicated programs into simple tools—or vice versa

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In my August Scientific American column I wrote about the rise of two populations with a growing mistrust of one another: the technologically savvy, and the technologically inexperienced—the Knows and the Know-Nots.

A problem often arises when a product is marketed to the whole world without specifying which audience it's for. Novices struggle with the complexity; tech-heads struggle with the inflexibility.

It's not that nobody cares. Over the years the big tech companies have taken stabs at making their products accessible to both crowds—by offering an option to use a stripped-down, simplified interface. For example:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Simple Finder has been a little-known part of the Mac operating system for many years. (It's the successor to an earlier feature called At Ease.) It attempts to make the computer easier to use. There's only one window. One click, not two, opens things. You can't create folders, move icons or rename anything. Most of the menus are gone. You're presented with a simple scrolling list of programs that you can open—a list prepared for you by a parent or administrator.

Easy Mode, a feature of Samsung's popular Galaxy S5 phone, is much the same idea as Simple Finder: It hides most of the Android operating system's complexity.

For example, there are fewer settings available to change. You get only three home screens. One shows weather, clock, calendar, plus the icons for six apps (including phone and camera). A second home screen shows icons for your most recently used contacts. The third is available for you to customize with the icons of your own choice of apps.

HyperCard (1987–2004) was a popular build-your-own-software kit for the Mac and Apple IIGS. It let you create "cards" that could be linked to one another.

It offered five different "user levels," each with more features than the last, to accommodate people of all different degrees of experience. In Level 1 you could open HyperCard files, search, print and save; in Level 2 you could also create, edit and delete cards; Level 3 let you create graphics; Level 4 let you edit the links and backgrounds; in Level 5, you could write and edit scripts.

Logic Pro X, Apple's professional sound-editing program, offers a fascinating setting in Preferences called Show Advanced Tools. Sure enough: it makes a whole new set of features, windows and editing tools available that Apple deemed overwhelming to the novice. (Similar Advanced modes also lurk in programs such as iMovie, Nero, Sony Movie Studio and others.)

Unfortunately, these bipolar software designs aren't a perfect solution. The first problem is that the software company decides which features are "advanced" and which are "basic," and sometimes it guesses wrong. The second problem is that many customers aren't even aware that another mode (either more advanced or simpler) is available. The third problem is that changing the software interface at all means that you now have to learn it all over again. You've just made the software even more complex, because you now have twice as much to learn.

The struggle continues.

David Pogue is the anchor columnist for Yahoo Tech and host of several NOVA miniseries on PBS.

More by David Pogue
Scientific American Magazine Vol 311 Issue 2This article was published with the title “New Gadget Too Complicated? Try 'Easy Mode'” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 311 No. 2 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican082014-mafGnEHvSC8arEI3IUvpy

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe