The Good, the Bad and the Weirdest “Internet of Things” Things

Why haven't all of our objects gone wireless? Because nobody's buying this stuff

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This month my Scientific American column tackled the challenges that wirelessly controllable household appliances—the annoyingly termed “Internet of Things”—are facing in consumer acceptance. They're just not selling well.

That hasn't stopped companies from trying, though.

Remote-controlled thermostats and security cameras may make sense. But in the gold rush of the first wave of "IoT" products, not everything does. Here, for example, are a few of the connected and “smart” products that may raise your eyebrows.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Internet of Toilet Paper Rolls: RollScout is a toilet paper holder that lets you know (by e-mail, text, or app) when the roll is empty. “Especially useful for small businesses, such as cafes and restaurants, that have public restrooms and are focused on providing the best customer experience possible,” the creators say. (It is $60 for most finishes; the company site says it accepts preorders.)

The Internet of Egg Trays: The Egg Minder tray ($13.75 from Amazon) holds 14 eggs in your refrigerator. It also sends a wireless signal to your phone to let you know how many eggs are in it and which ones are going bad.

The Internet of Diapers: A start-up called 24eight has developed a prototype diaper that, when wet, texts the parent's phone. “A parent can remotely monitor a care center and get ‘diaper wet’ messages when they are at work," CEO David Schieffelin told The Wall Street Journal.

The Internet of Water Bottles: Thermos's $60 Connected Hydration Bottle tracks how much water you drink. It communicates your current tally with your phone by Bluetooth—either on the Fitbit app or Thermos's own water-tracking app.

The Internet of Jump Ropes: The Tangram Smart Rope, as you could probably guess, counts how much you jump rope with it; a companion app keeps track. The coolest part, though, is that embedded LEDs spell out your current count, as though on a ghostly hovering dashboard before you, as the rope flies through the air. (The Smart Rope was a successful Kickstarter campaign, said to be entering the manufacturing process in September 2015—but the company still says only that it's taking preorders.)

The Internet of Plants: The Parrot Flower Power ($50) is a sensor that you shove into the dirt near a plant, either in a pot or in open ground. Every 15 minutes it measures everything the plant is getting—moisture, fertilizer, temperature and light intensity—and transmits it by Bluetooth to a smartphone app.

The Internet of “Good Dogs”: The ICPooch, a Shark Tank success story ($227 from Amazon), lets you have video chats with your dog when you’re away. (You have to supply the iPad or other tablet on the dog's end; the iCPooch just holds it.) When you tap a button in the corresponding phone app, the device dispenses a dog treat by remote control.

David Pogue is the anchor columnist for Yahoo Tech and host of several NOVA miniseries on PBS.

More by David Pogue
Scientific American Magazine Vol 315 Issue 1This article was published with the title “The Good, the Bad and the Weirdest 'Internet of Things' Things” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 315 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican072016-4WD5NL0JXLoM76LTu4NXs0

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe