Why Orchestras Haven't Been Digitized

A short history of the battle to keep musical scores live

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

My September Scientific American column explores the push to replace live orchestras at operas and musicals with less expensive, but less satisfying, digital ones.

This issue affects me deeply, you see, because I wasn't always a technology writer. My original aspiration was to compose Broadway musicals.

After college I spent 10 years chasing that dream. While I waited for the world to discover my compositional genius I worked in the office of a theatrical licensing house called Music Theater International (MTI). Companies like MTI rent the rights, scripts and music for musicals such as Fiddler on the Roof or Les Misérables to your school or theater.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


My boss was fascinated by the possibilities of exploiting technology to foster more live theater. We had a lot of long conversations about what that meant. For example, should we offer canned recordings of the orchestra parts for our shows? Then many more schools and theaters would be able to produce musicals. But we also didn't want to be in the business of discouraging the use of live orchestras.

In the end, we limited our offerings to tools for use in rehearsals. For each show, we developed a set of MIDI files (which perfectly reproduce an original keyboard performance) for rehearsal use only. Because these disks could play the entire piano part perfectly, at any tempo and in any key, they permitted choir teachers, directors and choreographers to conduct appropriate rehearsals—and even multiple rehearsals simultaneously in different rooms. But we still insisted that our productions were performed with live music.

In the 20 years since then the licensing companies have tiptoed closer to permitting digital playback at live performances. For many elementary and middle schools—whose student orchestras simply don't have the ability to play a full score—productions can rent a CD of the show accompaniment; audiences are understanding.

But what about regular adult performances? Some licensing houses, including Theatrical Rights Worldwide (TRW), offer both a rehearsal tool and software that let productions perform with a digital orchestra. "We encourage live performers and live musicians but we also look to promote and encourage the performance of our musicals," TRW president Steve Spiegel says.

So far, he says, very few professional productions rely on these digital playback offerings. "It's a small percentage, maybe 10 percent of the shows we license," he says. "Most of them haven't done musicals before. They're building a program. They don't have the budget or the musicians available. A lot of them are overseas."

Elsewhere, he says, when funding is tight, most theaters prefer to reduce the number of live players rather than use prerecorded tracks. "The good news is that the majority, by far, are only looking for something to get through the rehearsal process," Spiegel tells me. "The excitement of having a live orchestra can never be replaced. The audience expectation can never be replaced. The great majority understands the impact that the live musicians have in the theater world, and that's very comforting."

David Pogue is the anchor columnist for Yahoo Tech and host of several NOVA miniseries on PBS.

More by David Pogue
Scientific American Magazine Vol 311 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Why Orchestras Haven't Been Digitized” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 311 No. 3 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican092014-6Mp2vb02SAcWPA5eFbyod2

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe