New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Poll: Climate Change, Global Leadership Should Be Top Priorities for U.S. Space Program

A majority of Americans in a new national survey expressed support for a vision of space exploration largely at odds with the federal government’s present plans

An artist’s concept of NASA’s planned next rocket, the Space Launch System (SLS), lifting off from Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

According to a national survey, the majority of Americans think that it is essential for the U.S. to remain a global leader in space exploration.

The U.S. has been deeply involved in the pursuit of advancing space exploration since the early days of space travel in the mid-20th century. But, as the years have gone on, other countries and private organizations have grown considerably and become rival leaders in space exploration. The Pew Research Center conducted a national survey in the U.S. to assess how Americans felt about the country’s future as a space leader.

The survey was conducted from March 27 to April 9 and used data from 2,541 U.S. adults. According to the survey, 72 percent of Americans think that the U.S. needs to remain a leader in space exploration. Additionally, 80 percent of Americans feel that the International Space Station has been a positive investment for the U.S., according to the survey.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Surprisingly, while the survey participants were largely in agreement that the U.S. should remain a leader in space, their responses were more mixed when they were asked about the importance of NASA versus private spaceflight companies. Approximately 65 percent of participants said that they believe NASA is essential to space exploration, while a significant 33 percent didn’t think that NASA is necessary, and that private companies are capable of advancing space exploration all on their own.

However, while many Americans are excited about the growth of private spaceflight, they are very concerned and skeptical about these companies’ dedication to minimizing human-made space debris, according to the survey. Only 13 percent of those surveyed were very confident that private companies will minimize space junk, and a massive 51 percent had little to no confidence that these companies would properly address the space debris issue.

Still, the survey found that those who paid more attention to space news generally had higher confidence in private space companies’ ability to build satisfactory spacecraft. Ninety-five percent of participants who paid the most attention to space news had at least a fair amount of confidence that private companies would produce reliable and safe rockets and spacecraft.

Other findings from the study show what Americans think our top priorities in space should be:

  • 62 percent think that monitoring asteroids or other objects that might collide with Earth should be a top priority.

  • 47 percent think that conducting basic scientific research to advance knowledge and our understanding of space should be a top priority.

  • 41 percent think that developing technologies that could be applied outside of space exploration should be a top priority.

  • 38 percent think that conducting research on how space affects human health should be a top priority.

  • 31 percent think that searching for life and planets that could support life should be a top priority.

Other findings from the study show what Americans think lower priorities for space exploration should be:

  • 25 percent said that monitoring key parts of Earth’s climate should be an important but lower priority and 11 percent said it is not too important or should not be done.

  • 45 percent think that sending astronauts to Mars is important but should be a lower priority and 37 percent think it’s not too important or should not be done.

  • 42 percent think that sending astronauts to the moon is important but should be a lower priority and 44 percent think it’s not too important or should not be done.

Perhaps the most surprising takeaway from this survey is that the majority of participants questioned said that they would not travel to space as tourists if they had the opportunity (58 percent would not want to go versus 42 percent who would). Twenty-eight percent of those asked thought it would be too scary; 28 percent thought it might be too expensive; and 28 percent didn’t think that they would be able to make the journey, due to their health or age.

The survey found that the younger demographic was more interested in the possibility of orbiting the Earth one day. Sixty-three percent of "millennials" (categorized as those born between 1981 and 1996) are either definitely or probably interested, whereas 39 percent of those from Generation X (1965 to 1980) and only 27 percent of those from the baby boomer generation or older were interested in such an adventure.

Copyright 2018 SPACE.com, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe