New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Pollution Level Affects Lung Growth in Children

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Besides obscuring the view, hazy air filled with car exhaust, dust and smoke can slow the development of adolescent lungs, a new study suggests. The report, published in the December issue of the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, shows that children's lung performance is affected by the amount of particulate air pollution in their community.

Edward L. Avol of the University of Southern California and colleagues began their study by testing the lung function of adolescents living in Southern California, measuring how much air the subjects could expel and how quickly. "Lung function typically peaks in your 20s and then slowly declines with age," Avol explains. "So what happens during that big growth spurt during the teen years may be especially important later in life." Five years later, the researchers then retested the 110 children who had moved to other communities in California, Oregon, Nevada, Washington, Arizona and Utah. They found that students who had relocated to areas with lower levels of particulate matter experienced increased lung function growth. Those who moved to areas with more particulate pollution, in contrast, exhibited a slowdown in lung function growth. The differences were most striking in students who had lived in their new area for more than three years. "This study confirms our earlier work showing that air pollution can have long-term effects on lung health in children," Avol notes.

Current thinking suggests that children who experience decreased lung function could prove more susceptible to respiratory disease or be more likely to have chronic respiratory difficulties as adults. The researchers plan to continue monitoring the children to investigate any persistent and long-term effects air pollution may have. But Avol would like prevention strategies in place now. The current study, he says, "shows that cleaning up the air actually has a measurable effect on children's health."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe