Pollution Level Affects Lung Growth in Children

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Besides obscuring the view, hazy air filled with car exhaust, dust and smoke can slow the development of adolescent lungs, a new study suggests. The report, published in the December issue of the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, shows that children's lung performance is affected by the amount of particulate air pollution in their community.

Edward L. Avol of the University of Southern California and colleagues began their study by testing the lung function of adolescents living in Southern California, measuring how much air the subjects could expel and how quickly. "Lung function typically peaks in your 20s and then slowly declines with age," Avol explains. "So what happens during that big growth spurt during the teen years may be especially important later in life." Five years later, the researchers then retested the 110 children who had moved to other communities in California, Oregon, Nevada, Washington, Arizona and Utah. They found that students who had relocated to areas with lower levels of particulate matter experienced increased lung function growth. Those who moved to areas with more particulate pollution, in contrast, exhibited a slowdown in lung function growth. The differences were most striking in students who had lived in their new area for more than three years. "This study confirms our earlier work showing that air pollution can have long-term effects on lung health in children," Avol notes.

Current thinking suggests that children who experience decreased lung function could prove more susceptible to respiratory disease or be more likely to have chronic respiratory difficulties as adults. The researchers plan to continue monitoring the children to investigate any persistent and long-term effects air pollution may have. But Avol would like prevention strategies in place now. The current study, he says, "shows that cleaning up the air actually has a measurable effect on children's health."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe