Portable Scanner for Breast Cancer

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Despite recent improvements in traditional mammography¿among them computer-aided detection (CAD) and digital mammography¿too many breast cancers go undiscovered for too long. This is especially true for young women: their denser breast tissue makes small tumors difficult, if not impossible, to find. But a team of scientists from the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard University is working to develop an entirely new way of testing for tumors before they spread. Yesterday Britton Chance, an emeritus professor of biochemistry and biophysics at Penn, described their novel approach at the annual meeting of the American Physical Society in Seattle.

The detection method relies on tricarbo-cyanine, a contrast agent normally used for testing liver function. The researchers inject fluorescent tricarbo-cyanine molecules coated with a special peptide into the bloodstream. The mixture travels to the breast, where it is specifically taken up by malignant cells. These cells, in turn, crack open the peptide cloak to expose the glowing tricarbo-cyanine, which can be detected by a circle of tiny laser diodes in a hand-held sensor.

"In our preliminary test, we had a success rate in the percentage range of the high 80s," Chance says. And the procedure is about to enter phase-II clinical trials in a larger group of women. These trials are being conducted at Dartmouth University and the University of California, Irvine¿as well as at such pharmaceutical companies as Phillips, Siemens, ART and Imaging Diagnostic Systems, Inc. Chance adds that the technique should offer advantages over traditional mammography not only for younger women at risk, but also for women in remote areas. "The proposed hand-held unit has outreach possibilities," he says, "for under-served populations of women who can't get to a clinic or hospital for an X-ray."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe