Practically Green: A Q&A with the Chevy Volt's Chief Engineer

As the Chevy Volt, the first extended-range electric car, rolls into showrooms, its chief engineer talks about what's under the hood and why it's not a hybrid

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Name: Pamela Fletcher
Title: GM’s Global Chief Engineer for Volt and Plug-In Hybrid Electric Powertrains
Location: Milford Proving Grounds, Michigan

GM developed the Volt in only 29 months. Its lithium-ion battery powers the car for the first 25 to 50 miles, at which point a small gasoline engine kicks in to replenish the battery, allowing the car to travel up to another 300 miles. What were some of your biggest engineering challenges? One was the question of how to integrate the combustion engine with the generator when the car is in its extended-range mode. We wanted the “character” of the car to be as consistent as possible between electric and extended-range operation [when the battery runs down]. To do that, we created a “load-following behavior” for the engine: as power is drawn from the battery, the engine comes in to make up that power. This lets us lead with the battery, and gives the Volt some “EV-ness,” even in range extension.

At the same time, we wanted the engine to respond in a manner that drivers would expect. The Volt’s engine does not have to behave like an engine in a conventional vehicle; its speed does not have to follow the vehicle speed or the throttle directly. So we added some audible cues to assure the driver that the engine “hears” the commands that the driver is giving, such as reducing the speed or load slightly when the driver backs out of the throttle.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Other than having no tailpipe, the Volt looks like many other sedans. Why didn’t GM give the car an edgier design? I have found that people like the fact that this car has a sportiness to it without being overly aggressive. You can be green without driving a spaceship.

The EPA recently classified the Volt as a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle and not as an electric car. What is your reaction to that? Any­time you’re first, those are the kinds of issues that come up. I see the Volt as an electric car with extended range. No kidding—you can have the full performance of the car without the engine ever coming on. These blended plug-ins that are being talked about don’t do that.

What led you to this career path? My dad raced all kinds of cars as a hobby, and I had no brothers. I was the older of two girls, so I was the one who always got corralled into working on the cars and going to the track. After a while, you get addicted to the adrenaline. Not only do you get addicted to the styling, you can also get addicted to the scale and the scope of the industry. I learned to love cars, and I think cars are the greatest consumer product.

Anna Kuchment is a contributing editor at Scientific American and a staff science reporter at the Dallas Morning News. She is also co-author of a forthcoming book about earthquakes triggered by energy production.

More by Anna Kuchment
Scientific American Magazine Vol 304 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Practically Green: A Q&A with the Chevy Volt's Chief Engineer” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 304 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican012011-1hCD2WF2EMqB6v1WmLy6LB

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe