Practice Improves Vision in the Cortically Blind

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The term "blindsight" may sound like an oxymoron, but it's actually a bizarre effect in which people who have lost some of their vision from brain damage are still able to react to stimuli hidden in their blind spots. Researchers report that repeatedly stimulating the blind spots of partially blind people for several months can improve their ability to use blindsight in laboratory tests, suggesting that larger trials of the technique are warranted.

Stroke, trauma or surgery can cause so-called cortical blindness by knocking out a portion of the visual cortex, the part of the brain that receives input from the eyes. Blindsight is thought to occur because the brain is capable of rerouting the visual information that the eyes are still receiving. Examples of the effect include being able to guess the color, motion and even emotional expression of visual stimuli placed in the blind spot at better than chance rates. Some groups have tried to identify improvements in blindsight after repeated stimulations, but such studies have generally involved introducing stimuli near the edges of the blind spot, which leaves open the possibility that subjects could have skewed the data by shifting their gaze.

Hoping to eliminate this source of uncertainty, vision researcher Arash Sahraie of the University of Aberdeen in Scotland and his colleagues asked 12 cortically blind people to practice their blindsight for stimuli smack in the middle of their blind spots. Daily for three months, participants using home computers repeatedly guessed which of two stimuli was presented to them first--either a flickering circular field of black and white lines, designed to maximally stimulate their cortices, or a gray dot. After the at-home training, the participants improved in a laboratory test of the same ability compared with tests given before the training, according a report appearing online September 25 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. On average trainees added 5 to 10 percent to their fraction of correct guesses and reported being consciously aware of the correct answer about twice as often. When tested for blindsight in another part of their blind spot, away from the center, participants reported no change in awareness and only a modest improvement in their ability to distinguish stimuli. "These are very encouraging results," says Sahraie. A clinical trial of the technique will be needed to determine if the technique improves the blind's quality of life, he points out.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


According to neuropsychologist James Danckert of the University of Waterloo in Ontario, who was not involved in the study, "this represents a remarkable demonstration of plasticity in the adult brain. The changes occur a long time after neural damage was sustained." To get the biggest improvement, though, trainees might have to work on their whole blind spots, he notes.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe