Practicing Fusion

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image: J. ZWEIBACK/LLNL

The promise of building commercial fusion reactors for generating electric power is balanced against a number of technical challenges--chief among them, how to make a material capable of sustaining the constant bombardment of high-energy neutrons. "Any standard material just turns to cottage cheese," says Todd Ditmire of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. To date, researchers have turned to computer simulations to study this destruction, estimating that a single neutron hitting a crystal can melt 10 5 ions, which recrystallize imperfectly within nanoseconds. Over time, the imperfections add up, compromising the material. But in hopes of verifying this problem in the real world, last year Ditmire and his colleages created a tabletop system that produces a tiny taste of it in the form of super-short neutron pulses. In the October 23 issue of Physical Review Letters, they characterize the pulse in detail.

In this laboratory system, the researchers blast a cluster of heavy hydrogen atoms with a quick and powerful laser punch (pink in the image above). This punch blows off the electrons and leaves the remaining mutually-repulsive ions to explode so violently that nearby heavy hydrogen clusters fuse and emit neutrons [white area above]. This neutron pulse is a mere 650 picoseconds wide, and the group's calculations suggest that 100 ps pulses should be possible. They propose using the system to study radiative damage by hitting a solid first with the neutron pulse and then with an x-ray pulse from the same laser to record the aftermath. "You could make a movie of this melting and recrystallization," Ditmire notes. Such a movie might suggest ways to protect the solid from the neutron onslaught.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe