Pre-Columbian Aquaculture

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Every year between November and April, rivers flood Baures, a savanna region in the Bolivian Amazon. Such seasonal inundation would have rendered the natural landscape essentially uninhabitable for most, but indigenous peoples have found ways around it--constructing elevated fields, settlement mounds and causeways--for thousands of years. Now new evidence suggests that they may have even taken advantage of their watery environs. In a study published today in the journal Nature, University of Pennsylvania anthropologist Clark L. Erickson< reports that a network of low, zigzag structures of raised earth and ponds covering hundreds of square kilometers in Baures represents a pre-Columbian fishery.

The 20-to-50-centimeter-tall fish weirs, Erickson notes, cover the spawning sites of numerous fish species. In practice, the weirs would have guided fish to places where they could be easily collected. And artificial ponds maintained throughout the year would have enabled continuous access to fresh fish and drinking water. The pre-Columbian structures are similar to fish weirs used by locals today, but the older structures were permanent and more extensive than their modern counterparts, which are rebuilt each season. In fact, considering the complexity of the pre-Columbian network, Erickson suggests that the weirs and large causeways might also have been used to manage water in the region. "The earthworks could have extended the period of inundation by capturing the first rains and holding floodwaters into the dry season," he writes.

"Prior to the arrival of the Europeans, the Native Americans of this region applied their knowledge of hydrology, soils, ecology and agriculture to build a highly productive landscape," Erickson notes, estimating that building the roughly 1,500 linear kilometers of fish weirs in Baures would have required some 300,000 person-days of labor. "Although the native peoples were removed from the lands by the Spanish missionaries and by European-introduced epidemics, the abandoned earthworks still influence the vegetation, drainage and biodiversity of the region today." In fact, the pre-Columbian approach might better serve the region¿s modern inhabitants, a possibility that Erickson hopes to address soon with an experimental fish weir project. "Archaeology can contribute to the long-term study of environments," he adds. "And, I believe, provide models for sustainable development based on past uses of the land."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe