New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Predatory Dinosaurs Breathed Like Birds, Study Suggests

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A new analysis suggests that theropod dinosaurs such as T. rex shared another characteristic with their modern day bird descendants: their mode of breathing. Although some scientists have posited that the extinct creatures would have had lungs similar to those of today's crocodiles and other reptiles, the results instead indicate that theropods used a more complex pulmonary system resembling that of living birds.

Birds have a number of extra air sacs in their skeletons that supply their lungs with air and enhance their ability to exchange gases. Patrick M. O'Connor of the Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine and Leon P. A. M. Claessens of Harvard University analyzed a 67-million-year-old fossil of Majungatholus atopus, a primitive theropod that grew to several meters in length. Comparing the remains to data collected on more than 200 living birds, they found that the creature possessed a surprisingly avian anatomy. The dinosaur's vertebrae, in particular, exhibit adaptations like those seen in extant sarus cranes. "The pulmonary system of meat-eating dinosaurs such as T. rex in fact shares many structural similarities with that of modern birds, which, from an engineering point of view, may possess the most efficient respiratory system of any living vertebrate inhabiting the land or the sky," Claessens remarks.

The results, published in today's issue of the journal Nature, indicate that the system that birds use for breathing developed before birds themselves evolved. This respiratory adaptation, the authors note, is consistent with the hypothesis that predatory dinosaurs had elevated metabolic rates.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe