New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Predicting Alzheimer's

A new technique may give years of advanced warning

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease is difficult—confirmation can be obtained only postmortem, by verifying at autopsy that the brain has an abundant amount of plaque made up of the sticky beta-amyloid protein. To gauge Alzheimer’s in living patients, neurologists must depend on time-consuming assessments of the brain’s degeneration—such as monitoring progressive memory loss—that often delay a conclusive judgment.

Now a new technique is poised to greatly speed diagnosis. Ongoing studies at Uppsala University in Sweden have shown that the chemical agent dubbed Pittsburgh Compound-B, or PIB, is a highly accurate marker of plaque buildup and that its abundance in the brain can predict whether patients with mild cognitive impairment will develop Alzheimer’s—and when that decline will likely start. “It has always been a puzzle,” says Chester A. Mathis, a radiologist at the University of Pittsburgh who pioneered the amyloid-imaging technique with Pittsburgh psychiatrist William E. Klunk. Even specialty clinics, Mathis says, have trouble distinguishing those patients whose memory loss is a prelude to Alzheimer’s from those who have another underlying cause, such as depression.

PIB works by binding to amyloid in sufficient amounts to appear in a positron-emission tomography (PET) scan image. Because PIB selectively binds to brain amyloid deposits but quickly clears from normal tissue, the chemical dye accurately indicates the amount of protein that is deposited in the living brain. Although other tracers can detect the presence of plaque, PIB is the first to show a strong ability to predict the onset of Alzheimer’s.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The technique could provide potential Alzheimer’s sufferers and their families with several years of advance warning, allowing them to prepare for the debilitating disease while delaying its arrival with diet and exercise. Even more promising, experts say, is the window of opportunity for drug intervention. Many potential Alzheimer’s drugs such as Alzhemed, now in its final clinical trial, target amyloid plaque. PIB is not only a powerful tool for studying the efficacy of these drugs; it is also a way to ensure that patients on the road to Alzheimer’s start getting treated early enough to minimize irreparable neuronal loss.

SA Mind Vol 19 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Predicting Alzheimers” in SA Mind Vol. 19 No. 1 (), p. 12
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0208-12b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe