Predicting Alzheimer's

A new technique may give years of advanced warning

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease is difficult—confirmation can be obtained only postmortem, by verifying at autopsy that the brain has an abundant amount of plaque made up of the sticky beta-amyloid protein. To gauge Alzheimer’s in living patients, neurologists must depend on time-consuming assessments of the brain’s degeneration—such as monitoring progressive memory loss—that often delay a conclusive judgment.

Now a new technique is poised to greatly speed diagnosis. Ongoing studies at Uppsala University in Sweden have shown that the chemical agent dubbed Pittsburgh Compound-B, or PIB, is a highly accurate marker of plaque buildup and that its abundance in the brain can predict whether patients with mild cognitive impairment will develop Alzheimer’s—and when that decline will likely start. “It has always been a puzzle,” says Chester A. Mathis, a radiologist at the University of Pittsburgh who pioneered the amyloid-imaging technique with Pittsburgh psychiatrist William E. Klunk. Even specialty clinics, Mathis says, have trouble distinguishing those patients whose memory loss is a prelude to Alzheimer’s from those who have another underlying cause, such as depression.

PIB works by binding to amyloid in sufficient amounts to appear in a positron-emission tomography (PET) scan image. Because PIB selectively binds to brain amyloid deposits but quickly clears from normal tissue, the chemical dye accurately indicates the amount of protein that is deposited in the living brain. Although other tracers can detect the presence of plaque, PIB is the first to show a strong ability to predict the onset of Alzheimer’s.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The technique could provide potential Alzheimer’s sufferers and their families with several years of advance warning, allowing them to prepare for the debilitating disease while delaying its arrival with diet and exercise. Even more promising, experts say, is the window of opportunity for drug intervention. Many potential Alzheimer’s drugs such as Alzhemed, now in its final clinical trial, target amyloid plaque. PIB is not only a powerful tool for studying the efficacy of these drugs; it is also a way to ensure that patients on the road to Alzheimer’s start getting treated early enough to minimize irreparable neuronal loss.

SA Mind Vol 19 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Predicting Alzheimers” in SA Mind Vol. 19 No. 1 (), p. 12
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0208-12b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe