New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Prehistoric Plankton Became Predators to Survive a Mass Extinction

When the sun disappeared, tiny coccoliths turned to hunting

A modern coccolith has holes that help with locomotion.

A modern coccolith has holes that help with locomotion.

From “Algal Plankton Turn to Hunting to Survive and Recover From End-cretaceous Impact Darkness,” by Samantha J. Gibbs et al., in Science Advances, Vol. 6, No. 44; October 30, 2020

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

An asteroid strike 66 million years ago not only devastated the dinosaurs but almost reset life in the oceans back to a primitive soup of simple microorganisms. What prevented ocean ecosystems from totally collapsing, scientists hypothesize, may have been shell-covered algae that could feed on other organisms but maintained the ability to photosynthesize. This skill would preserve the foundation of the marine realm's complex food webs through a long dark spell.

The predatory plankton belonged to a family of armored, algaelike organisms called coccolithophores, or coccoliths. They have been around for about 200 million years, and many forms still bob along as ocean plankton today. But their survival was especially significant in the wake of the mass extinction at the end of the Cretaceous period, when debris from the asteroid's impact and wildfire ash blotted out the sun for two years. Life experienced a prolonged “impact winter” when photosynthesis all but ceased.

“The food webs in the ocean have photosynthesis as their foundation, just like the land, but in the ocean the photosynthesis is carried out by microscopic bacteria and algae,” says University of Southampton paleontologist Samantha Gibbs, lead author of a new study in Science Advances. Coccoliths were among these energy converters in the Cretaceous, and about 90 percent of coccolith species went extinct after impact.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Lacking light for their energy needs, Gibbs says, “the handful of survivor species were able to turn to food capture and ingestion.” Small holes in coccolith fossils indicate that the survivors possessed whiplike flagella that let them move and stalk other organisms. The researchers tracked hunter algae's prevalence in the fossil record and modeled the organisms' evolution to show how they could have survived and adapted to the sun's disappearance—and then its return, when they proliferated again.

Experts have long wondered how photosynthesis-using organisms such as coccoliths endured without sunlight. “This is a really exciting finding that goes a long way to explaining an apparent paradox in the extinction,” says University of Texas at Austin paleontologist Christopher Lowery, who was not involved in the study.

The model may explain changes in other organisms as well. Small creatures called foraminifera, or forams, also took a hit from the impact but persisted. They were armored, too, and those that survived evolved spines. The spines would have worked together with miniature tentacles to help forams grab larger prey, Lowery says, bolstering the idea that other single-celled organisms also adapted their feeding style.

Eventually coccolith survivors picked up photosynthesis again, revitalizing the ocean's food webs when light returned. Tiny, hungry algae helped to save the seas.

Riley Black, who formerly wrote under the name Brian Switek, is the author of Skeleton Keys and My Beloved Brontosaurus. She lives in Salt Lake City, Utah. Follow her on Twitter @Laelaps and on Instagram @laelaps

More by Riley Black
Scientific American Magazine Vol 324 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Predatory Algae” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 324 No. 3 (), p. 19
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0321-19

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe