Preserving Forests and Business

How conservation, urban development and logging requirements can coexist

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As forest landowners shift their attention away from logging toward more lucrative—and destructive—uses such as suburban development, forest conservation is more crucial than ever. Historically, protecting woodlands has been a slow and difficult process: conservationists raised large sums of money, bought big tracts, and put them into public
ownership with strict rules against intrusions. Recently, however, a handful of organizations have found an easier way: buy the land with loans and repay them by turning the forest into a nonprofit business.

Since 2004 the Conservation Fund, based in Virginia, has purchased 40,000 acres of forest along California’s Mendocino Coast—with plans this year to buy 35,000 more—using a mixture of grants, donations and public loans. It is paying off the loans by selling companies the rights to selectively log the forest, which can actually help it grow. Last year the California-based Redwood Forest Foundation, Inc. (RFFI), adopted an even more businesslike approach: it purchased 50,635 acres of California forest for $65 million using a low-interest private loan. The organization plans to earn back money by logging and selling conservation easements.

These transactions have inspired others, suggesting the beginnings of a dramatic shift in conservation practice. The Oregon-based Deschutes Land Trust is working to secure 28,000 acres of Skyline Forest outside of Bend, Ore., and the Columbia Land Trust is negotiating to purchase land in Washington State. No one knows how successful the new approach will be; the pressure to earn back loan money could lead to difficult logging decisions. “We did it because we knew that we had to try it,” says Chris Kelly, California program director of the Conservation Fund, in part because raising donations is becoming harder. “The alternative was to sit back on our hands and let somebody else convert the land.”

SA Special Editions Vol 18 Issue 4sThis article was published with the title “Preserving Forests and Business” in SA Special Editions Vol. 18 No. 4s (), p. 15
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanearth0908-15

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe