New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Pressure Sensitive

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Regular exercise may not help patients with severe high blood pressure as much as it does those with moderate hypertension. Yvonne Plantinga and her colleagues at the University of Pisa in Italy examined artery elasticity in 400 middle-aged volunteers. Stiffer arteries increase pressure on the heart. Regular exercise reduced stiffness in patients with normal or mildly high blood pressure but not in those with untreated, more severe conditions. “Medication and exercise would do better than just medication for those patients,” Plantinga suggested at the American Society of Hypertension conference in May.

At the meeting, experts also moved to extend the definition of hypertension, suggesting it is a syndrome whose early stages can include normal blood pressure (a reading below 120/80). Exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise or mental stress, small amounts of protein in the urine, and an impaired ability to process blood sugar are among several symptoms that can be signs. Redefining hypertension may help physicians identify the disease earlier.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 293 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Pressure Sensitive” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 293 No. 1 (), p. 26
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0705-26c

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe