Pressure Sensitive

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Regular exercise may not help patients with severe high blood pressure as much as it does those with moderate hypertension. Yvonne Plantinga and her colleagues at the University of Pisa in Italy examined artery elasticity in 400 middle-aged volunteers. Stiffer arteries increase pressure on the heart. Regular exercise reduced stiffness in patients with normal or mildly high blood pressure but not in those with untreated, more severe conditions. “Medication and exercise would do better than just medication for those patients,” Plantinga suggested at the American Society of Hypertension conference in May.

At the meeting, experts also moved to extend the definition of hypertension, suggesting it is a syndrome whose early stages can include normal blood pressure (a reading below 120/80). Exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise or mental stress, small amounts of protein in the urine, and an impaired ability to process blood sugar are among several symptoms that can be signs. Redefining hypertension may help physicians identify the disease earlier.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 293 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Pressure Sensitive” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 293 No. 1 (), p. 26
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0705-26c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe