Preventing Cars from Running off Railroad Tracks

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Where the road forms a curve of 2000 feet diameter, the difference between the length of the outer and the inner track is equal to 5 feet for every 1000 feet of road when the gauge is 4 feet, and nearly 6 feet to the 1000 for a 6 foot gauge. This difference causes the inner wheel to drag on the rail, thereby increasing the resistance and wearing out the tire. If, by this cause, one of the wheels gets worn out more than the other, its diameter will be smaller and the motion of the car in a straight line will become dangerous from the same cause: the larger wheel causes the smaller one to drag. If one of the wheels drags, the sliding friction produced thereby gives a tendency to the car to place itself crossways on the track. It is dangerous therefore to run at great speed even on a curve of 3000 feet diameter, and as this makes it necessary in building a railroad to avoid curves as much as possible, a road through a rugged or uneven country is very expensive. The axles have to be made unnecessarily strong as they have to sustain a twist from the same cause. An Austrian civil engineer undertook to avoid this difficulty by putting the wheels on a separate axle each and uniting the two halves oy different means; none of them, however, seems to us perfect enough to deserve recommendation, and we expect our inventors will come to the rescue and will find out some cheap and simple plan to give each of the wheels an independent motion from the other, still making the whole strong enough and safe against accidents.— Journal of the Society of Austrian Civil Engineers.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 12This article was published with the title “Preventing Cars from Running off Railroad Tracks” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 12 (), p. 91
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican11281857-91c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe