Primitive Crustacean Is Surprisingly Brainy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The small, eyeless crustaceans known as Remipedia have been underestimated, scientists say. According to a report published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the creatures actually have highly organized and well differentiated brains. The findings suggest that the animals may belong further up the evolutionary tree, alongside crabs and lobsters.

Discovered in 1979, Remipedia inhabit deep, dark ocean caves and use fangs and poisonous glands to kill their prey. But just how the animals should be classified amongst their fellow crustaceans is the subject of ongoing debate. Martin Fanenbruck of the University of Bochum in Germany and his colleagues reconstructed the brain anatomy (see image) of the remipede Godzilliognomus frondosus. They found that the brain is surprisingly complex, considering G. frondosus¿s generally slow movements and ancient body plan. The olfactory region in particular is very large, the team reports, because the creatures rely predominantly on smell to locate food in their cavernous surroundings.

The scientists estimate that the number of neurons G. frondosus has is comparable to that of higher-level malacostracans, such as crabs, shrimps and lobsters. Consequently, they argue, Remipedia should be considered a sister group to Malacostraca.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe