New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Primordial Giant Kangaroos Did Not Hop, They Walked

Janis et al.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The large marsupials of the middle Miocene that grazed the planet some 16 million years ago did not resemble the hippity-hoppity kangaroos we think of today. Christine Janis and colleagues at Brown University presented this rendering of the large sthenurine kangaroo, a subfamily member of the marsupial family Macropodidae, in PLoS ONE on October 15.
 
Their portrayal of a now-extinct ancestor of the relatively dainty present-day roo illustrates how this “short-faced” marsupial’s unique body size and bone structure would make hopping on its two legs nearly impossible. Scientists speculated previously that the ancient sthenurine’s specialized forelimbs and a rigid lumbar spine would limit its ability to perform a pentapedal walk, or a low-speed gait that kangaroos commonly use instead of hopping.
 
The modern-day kangaroo propels itself forward by putting all four feet on the ground and using its tail as a sturdy fifth limb. After comparing bone and muscle measurements of the sthenurine with today’s kangaroos, Janis’s team found differences that would suggest this species had a completely different gait altogether.
 
The giant kangaroo, weighing an estimated 240 kilograms, appears to have held itself upright, lacking the specialized features that would allow it to hop rapidly. Its firm ankle joints and large hips and knees were likely strong enough to support its body weight on one leg at a time. Such features suggest that it walked like us, one plodding foot in front of the other, with a bit of a bowlegged gait. This stride may have enabled it to browse shrubs and trees for food without expending a lot of energy hopping from low to haute courses in a meal.
 
Julia Calderone  

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe