Sometimes the language of science falters in conveying the staggering complexity and profound beauty of the brain. Cue art. The Art of Neuroscience competition, an annual contest directed by the Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, pushes researchers and artists to break from the rigid structure of the academic paper and cast the brain in a creative light. This year’s entrants blended color, sound, light and—in one case—human blood to celebrate the intricacies of humanity’s most mysterious organ. Below, Scientific American presents the winning entry and honorable mentions, along with our editors’ top picks*.
2018 Art Of Neuroscience Winner: For all sad words of tongue and pen, the saddest are these, ‘It might have been’
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
*Editor’s Note: Liz Tormes served as one of the judges in this year’s competition.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
