New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Problems with the Multiverse

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the moments after the big bang, spacetime expanded so rapidly that, in addition to our own, many—maybe infinite— universes exploded into existence (I envision these universes as bubbles that surge up when you blow air through a straw into your glass). So goes the “multiverse” component of string theory. To be sure, the multiverse is decidedly centered in the pop physics zeitgeist, capturing the minds of the public in books, comics and film. Now a view of string theory posits that the infinite number of universes predicted cannot accommodate the stable dark energy required in any universe. But this may not necessarily be a bad thing for string theory research. Read more in “String Theory May Create Far Fewer Universes Than Thought,” by Clara Moskowitz. For better or worse, ours may be a more singular universe after all.

Elsewhere in this issue, scientists worry that human exploration of the solar system may unwittingly spread our pathogens to other worlds, possibly to the moon or Mars (see “Should the Moon Be Quarantined?” by David Warmflash). And physics experiments in search of a fundamental particle of gravity—the graviton—are employing some new tools such as microscopic superconductors, free-falling crystals and the cosmic background radiation (see “Is Gravity Quantum?” by Charles Q. Choi).

As always, we’d love to hear what you think!

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
SA Space & Physics Vol 1 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Problems with the Multiverse” in SA Space & Physics Vol. 1 No. 4 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican102018-7HoXnuvxc4h3lzyJPbrqg9

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe