Problems with the Multiverse

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the moments after the big bang, spacetime expanded so rapidly that, in addition to our own, many—maybe infinite— universes exploded into existence (I envision these universes as bubbles that surge up when you blow air through a straw into your glass). So goes the “multiverse” component of string theory. To be sure, the multiverse is decidedly centered in the pop physics zeitgeist, capturing the minds of the public in books, comics and film. Now a view of string theory posits that the infinite number of universes predicted cannot accommodate the stable dark energy required in any universe. But this may not necessarily be a bad thing for string theory research. Read more in “String Theory May Create Far Fewer Universes Than Thought,” by Clara Moskowitz. For better or worse, ours may be a more singular universe after all.

Elsewhere in this issue, scientists worry that human exploration of the solar system may unwittingly spread our pathogens to other worlds, possibly to the moon or Mars (see “Should the Moon Be Quarantined?” by David Warmflash). And physics experiments in search of a fundamental particle of gravity—the graviton—are employing some new tools such as microscopic superconductors, free-falling crystals and the cosmic background radiation (see “Is Gravity Quantum?” by Charles Q. Choi).

As always, we’d love to hear what you think!

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
SA Space & Physics Vol 1 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Problems with the Multiverse” in SA Space & Physics Vol. 1 No. 4 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican102018-7HoXnuvxc4h3lzyJPbrqg9

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe