New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Procrastination—And Other Stories from MIND

Executive Editor Mariette DiChristina introduces the December/January issue of Scientific American MIND

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Oof. It was yet another “gotcha” moment for me working here at Scientific American Mind. Walking home from the train a few days ago, I was running through my mental to-do list. I realized that, yet again, I somehow had not gotten around to the simple task of making appointments for routine dental and physical checkups. Fact is I still haven’t done so even as I type these words.

Why do I do that, when it’s so obviously smarter to get a quick screening now rather than risking the bother and expense of treating a possible cavity later? Thanks to the feature article “I’ll Do It Tomorrow,” by Trisha Gura, I now know why—and you will, too. Almost everyone procrastinates, as Gura explains, especially when we find a task disagreeable. But we can take steps to short-circuit such tendencies.

Interrupting—or correcting—circuits is also the key to an intriguing therapy called deep-brain stimulation. “The brain is an electrical organ, so there is little that goes wrong with it that could not, hypothetically, benefit from finely calibrated pulses of electricity,” write neuroscientists Morten L. Kringelbach and Tipu Z. Aziz in “Sparking Recovery with Brain ‘Pacemakers.’ ” A battery implanted in a person’s chest can, like a pacemaker, provide pulses of electricity to targeted areas of the brain to treat ailments such as Parkinson’s, chronic pain and depression.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


At the lead of another kind of treatment front are scientists who are trying to better understand “mild” traumatic brain injuries such as those sustained by hundreds of combat veterans in Iraq. In “Impact on the Brain,” neuropsychol­ogist Richard J. Roberts explains how a nearby blast that may knock out a soldier only briefly can nonetheless bruise brain tissue, resulting in later emotional trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder. Sports and accidents cause hundreds of thousands of similar injuries every year in the U.S. as well. A growing appreciation of the problem of mild brain trauma is spawning research into welcome treatments for this hidden plague.

Note: This article was originally published with the title, "Charge Forward".

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
SA Mind Vol 19 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Charge Forward” in SA Mind Vol. 19 No. 6 (), p. 1
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1208-1

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe