Professor Rogers on English Coal

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This distinguished American sxivant, who has just accepted a chair in the University of Glasgow, Scotland, in writing of the physical power which England derives from the transformation of the latent power of coal into active force, states the following interesting facts.:— " Each acre of a coal seam, four feet in thickness, and yielding one yard net of pure fuel, is equivalent to about 5,000 tuns ; and possesses, therefore, a reserve of mechanical strength in its fuel equal to the life-labor of more than 1,600 men. Each square mile of one such single coal bed contains 8,000,000 tuns of fuel; equivalent to 1,000,000 of men laboring through twenty years of their ripe strength. Assuming, for calculation, that 10,000,000 tuns out of the present annual products of the British coal mines, (namely, 65,000,000,) are applied to the production of mechanical power, then England annually summons to her aid an army of 3,300,000 fresh men pledged to exert their fullest strength through twenty years. Her actual annual expenditure of power then is represented by 6G,000,000 of able-bodied laborers. The latent strength resident in the whole coal product of the kingdom may, by the same process, be calculated at more than 400,000,000 of strong men, or more than double the number of the adult males now upon the globe."

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 14This article was published with the title “Professor Rogers on English Coal” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 14 (), p. 105
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican12121857-105

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe