New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Promising AIDS Vaccine

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: BRYAN CHRISTIE

Despite the fact that in recent years scientists have devised many drugs capable of stalling the onset of AIDS, the demand for an effective vaccine against the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), which causes the disease, has only grown. In regions of the world where HIV infection is spreading most quickly, the spate of new treatments are typically too expensive to help the people affected. Hopeful news comes from researchers at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center today, though, by way of a paper published in the journal Science. Norman Letvin and his colleagues describe a vaccine that prevented monkeys infected with a particularly deadly strain of HIV from becoming sick.

To create their new vaccine, the researchers borrowed a trick from tumor immunology, adding to DNA from the virus' core a fusion protein of interleukin-2 and part of immunoglobulin G (IgG). The first spike is a chemical messenger famous for its ability to activate killer CD8+ T cells--the very same immune cells that can target and destroy CD4+ T helper cells infected with HIV. And the IgG mixer helps to prolong the powers of interleukin-2. The idea behind this "vaccine-plus" design was to boost levels of the killer immune cells high enough that they keep levels of viral particles low enough to prevent illness and limit the chance of transmission.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In tests in rhesus monkeys, it seems to have worked. Among eight animals who received the new vaccine, all showed significantly increased killer T cell responses. And when they were subsequently infected with a combination of pathogenic HIV and SIV (the simian version of the virus), none became sick. After 140 days, all eight animals had high levels of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, nearly undetectable levels of the virus and no signs of clinical AIDS. By comparison, monkeys who received the viral DNA alone, without the double fusion protein punch, fared less well. And four of eight animals who did not receive any vaccine died of AIDS during the same time period.

"We haven't made a vaccine that will prevent AIDS virus infections in humans," Letvin says. "However, the findings in this study suggest that a vaccine might slow disease progression after an infection has occurred and decrease the likelihood of an infected individual transmitting the virus. This could have important ramifications for the AIDS epidemic."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe