Protein by the Splice

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The nucleus is not the only place where genetic instructions are pieced together. Messenger RNA, or mRNA, which conveys DNA instructions to the rest of the cell, is made of genetic sequences that, when spliced together properly, code for proteins. The many ways in which mRNA sequences can be woven back together help to create the body's vast diversity of proteins. Scientists thought that splicing took place only in the nucleus. Now, using fluorescent tags on splicing proteins in rat studies, molecular neurobiologist Jim Eberwine of the University of Pennsylvania and his colleagues have found that the process also occurs outside the nucleus—in particular, in dendrites, which are branches off neurons that help the cells receive electrical messages. Eberwine speculates that dendrites save mRNA in an unspliced form to ensure that the proteins they encode are not manufactured until needed. The findings appear in the November 15, 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 294 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Protein by the Splice” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 294 No. 1 (), p. 32
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0106-32c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe