Psychiatry's New Bible

As our understanding of mental illness grows, the diagnostic manual gets an update

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The month of May marks the release of the DSM-5, the fifth edition of the American Psychiatric Association's best-selling Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Because most insurance providers require a DSM diagnosis as a prerequisite for paying for treatment, the changes in the manual will affect health care for millions of Americans. Here are a few of the major revisions.

New Additions

Hoarding. No longer just a symptom of obsessive-compulsive disorder, research has revealed that the inability to throw away useless items is a malady in its own right.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Gambling disorder. The newest and most controversial member of the “Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders” chapter, compulsive gambling is now officially treatable as an addiction.

Disruptive mood regulation. Until now, kids who are regularly hostile or aggressive were often given the controversial diagnosis of bipolar disorder. Critics worry that giving the symptoms a new name will not solve the real problem: medicating children with drugs never meant for developing brains.

Out with the Old

Asperger's syndrome. The diagnosis and its popular perception—intelligent, single-minded, socially awkward—are a mark of pride for some self-titled Aspies. Now their symptom profile has been folded into the much broader “autism spectrum disorder.”

Sex addiction. Although the term “sex addiction” has not been in the manual since 2000, hypersexuality still warranted a diagnosis of “sexual disorder not otherwise specified.” Now the idea that excessive sex is an illness is gone from the book completely.

Proposed and Rejected

Attenuated psychosis risk syndrome. This proposed disorder was meant to identify children and teens at risk of psychotic disorders, but the model faced criticism over its mediocre ability to predict who will actually develop full-blown psychosis. The syndrome has been relegated to a chapter on conditions that require further research [see “At Risk for Psychosis?” by Carrie Arnold; Scientific American Mind, September/October 2011].

Adapted from “The Newest Edition of Psychiatry's ‘Bible,’ the DSM-V, Is Complete,” by Ferris Jabr; published online January 28, 2013. www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=dsm-5-update

Ferris Jabr is a contributing writer for Scientific American. He has also written for the New York Times Magazine, the New Yorker and Outside.

More by Ferris Jabr
SA Mind Vol 24 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Psychiatry's New Bible” in SA Mind Vol. 24 No. 2 (), p. 21
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0513-21a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe