Psychological Stress Better Predictor of Back Pain Than Standard Diagnostic Techniques

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Doctors often have a difficult time diagnosing a physical cause for some patients¿ lower back pain, which can be debilitating. A new report suggests that psychological distress may be a better indicator than medical imaging or injections when it comes to predicting who will develop aching backs.

Eugene J. Carragee of Stanford University and his colleagues tracked nearly 100 people over a four-year period to try to determine how effective predictive measures for lower back pain are. At the start of the study, the researchers used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which can identify small cracks or tears in cartilage, to examine the spines of 46 volunteers who did not suffer from lower back pain. In addition, the subjects underwent a procedure known as discography, in which a doctor injects fluid into the spine. If the injections cause pain, the theory holds, the patient may later develop back pain even if he doesn¿t currently suffer from it. Over the course of the study, the volunteers, along with a control group, completed yearly physical and psychological evaluations.

The researchers determined that patients suffering psychological distress were three times more likely to develop back pain than those with better coping skills. "The structural problems were really overwhelmed by the psychosocial factors," Carragee says. Experiencing other types of chronic pain was also linked to developing back pain, but discography results did not successfully predict future back problems, and the association between MRI results and back pain was not statistically significant. The team is now working on a five-year study that examines a more high-risk group of patients who already have common back pain. Notes Carragee: "The question is, Can we better identify groups that have a greater chance of being helped by surgery?" The study results appear in the May 15 issue of the journal Spine.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe