Pulsar Pair Backs Einstein

Score another one for general relativity. Albert Einstein's theory of gravity catapulted to fame in 1919 , thanks to measurements made during a solar eclipse.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Score another one for general relativity. Albert Einstein's theory of gravity catapulted to fame in 1919, thanks to measurements made during a solar eclipse. Nearly a century later, researchers have used a similar trick on a pair of orbiting pulsars (spinning neutron stars) to see if the theory holds up when gravity gets really strong. Einstein's theory dictates that if two massive objects such as superdense neutron stars circle one another, each's gravitational tug should cause the other's spin axis to precess or wobble like a spinning top. To check the prediction, researchers monitored the pulsar pair PSR JO737-3039A/B, which orbit each other every 2.4 hours. The pair's orbital plane happens to line up just right with Earth so that one of them regularly eclipses the lighthouselike beam of light from the other, allowing researchers to glean information about the hidden pulsar's orientation and rotation. They reported in Science that the size of the precession—about five degrees a year—matched well with Einstein's theory.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe