Pushy Ants Avoid Traffic Congestion

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Just as people can get fed up in traffic jams, so, too, can ants, new research suggests. A report published today in the journal Nature indicates that congestion on ant routes prompts the insects to shove one another around, leading some of them to take alternate routes. The findings could help researchers design novel algorithms for routing data traffic over networks.

When a scouting ant discovers a food source, it leaves an odor trail on its return trip to the nest that other ants can subsequently follow. As more ants travel the path, the scent becomes stronger and easier to follow. Audrey Dussutour of the Center for Animal Cognition Research in Toulouse, France, and her colleagues set up an experiment to investigate how overcrowding would affect the creatures¿ behavior. The team provided black garden ants with a sugary source of food that was separated from their nest by a diamond-shaped bridge. When the two paths were 10 millimeters wide, the ants favored one branch, indicating their preference for a well-trodden path. The scientists then narrowed the two trails to increase congestion. According to the report, when the paths were six millimeters wide or less, the ants began to utilize both sections of the bridge equally because collisions between ants leaving the nest and those returning with food forced some of the creatures to take the second pathway.

"We have demonstrated the surprising functionality of collisions among ants to keep up the desired flow level by generation of symmetrical traffic," the researchers note. By rerouting themselves, instead of just returning to the nest because their desired path became unavailable, the insects maintain the optimal rate of food return.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe