New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Put Your Money Where Your Mind Is

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

We do not notice many tasks that our brains perform, whereas we are completely aware of others. But it is sometimes hard for neuroscientists to determine when we are conscious of our actions. Now a group of British researchers is betting that betting can be used to study consciousness.

Navindra Persaud, Peter McLeod and Alan Cowey of the University of Oxford were interested in situations in which people can show high levels of cognitive performance with no apparent awareness. In one experiment, they studied a person known as GY, who, because of damage to his visual cortex, reports no vision in his right eye. But GY has a strange ability known as blindsight: he can guess with reasonable accuracy whether or not a symbol is shown to that eye, even though he reports no awareness of seeing it. The question has remained whether at some level he is conscious of his performance.

The researchers asked GY to make one of two wagers after each guess: £1 or half that amount. If he guessed correctly, the sum was added to his winnings. If he guessed incorrectly, the money was subtracted. In other words, GY had a financial incentive to be conscious of when he guessed correctly and bet high on those occasions. But although GY guessed correctly 70 percent of the time, he chose a high wager only about half of the time, almost at random.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers point out that the dissociation between cognitive performance and betting performance is surprising because, in a way, the high and low wagers are a decision very much like GY saying “yes” or “no” to seeing an object. They argue this disconnect between GY's blindsight performance and his betting success suggests that placing a bet is a special type of decision. Successful gambling appears to require consciousness of one's performance.

Persaud and his colleagues have already used this link to measure awareness in healthy volunteers. “We hope to combine [the wager test] with imaging and recording methods,” he says. That may make it possible to finally identify the elusive neural circuitry that encodes consciousness.

SA Mind Vol 18 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Put Your Money Where Your Mind Is” in SA Mind Vol. 18 No. 2 (), p. 8
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0407-8a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe