Puzzling Adventures: Alarm Clock Solution

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Solutions: 1. The best jump for the multi-minute button (MM) would be 8 minutes. In that case, the largest number of clicks would be 13. The worst case would be 54 minutes, which would require 6 clicks of the MM button followed by 7 clicks of the 1-minute button.

2. The jump sizes for MM in this case would be a descending sequence:
11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5
The largest number of clicks would then be 10. Advancing the minute hand by 10 minutes would require 10 clicks on the minute button. Advancing by 20 minutes requires one click of MM plus 9 clicks of the minute button. The worst case remains the same no matter how many times the multi-minute button is pressed.

3. If you have two multi-minute buttons, MM1 and MM2, then you could have one advance by 35 minutes and the other by 7. The worst case is 7 clicks, which occurs, for example, at 33 minutes (two clicks on the 35-minute button, then three on the 7-minute button, then two on the 1-minute button).

My colleague Richard Cole suggested the solution to problem 2.

Back to Main Puzzle

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe