Puzzling Adventures: Versatility for Another Planet: Making a Better Mars Rover--Solution for Problem Number 2

Spare parts mean more weight, more expense and less science. What if the redundancy worked differently?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


2. Just two failures. To show why three aren't possible, suppose that primary function A, backup 1 and backup 3 all failed. Then function A would have no device to do it. On the other hand, two failures cause no problems.

Here is why: If two backups fail, then all functions continue. If two primaries fail, then the warm-up shows that all functions are covered. If one primary and one backup fail, then the other backup that covers that primary will take over.

Back to main puzzle

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe