As Easy as Pie

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

If you've ever asked a young child to cut a pie for several people, the child will likely cut a piece for himself or herself and then pass you the knife. Perpendicular cuts across the length of the pie come naturally to older children for the sake of overall efficiency. Young children may find this to be too altruistic. This puzzle is an attempt to help you recapture that inner child.

You will design a series of cuts to partition a square pie into equal pieces to share among several people. The piece finally offered to each person is called a "final piece." Here are the rules.

1. All cuts must be straight and vertical.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


2. All final pieces must contain the same amount of pie volume (and, because of the first rule) the same amount of the top of the pie.

3.Child-cut rule: Every cut should yield one final piece except the last one, which yields two final pieces.

The goal, which admittedly might not occur to a child, is to minimize the sum of the perimeters of all the final pieces.

Warm-Up:
We start with the square pie in figure 1. We could cut that square pie into three pieces using two parallel cuts (A) or using two perpendicular cuts (B). Both satisfy the three rules: equal size final pieces, vertical cuts and child cut rule. Which yields a smaller total perimeter?

Solution to Warm-Up:
In the parallel cut case (A), each final piece has a perimeter of length 1 + 1/3 + 1 + 1/3 = 8/3. So the three final pieces altogether have a total perimeter of 8. Two perpendicular cuts (B) yield a first final piece having perimeter 8/3 and the remaining two final pieces each having perimeter: 2/3 + 1/2 + 2/3 + 1/2 = 7/3. So the total perimeter is 8/3 + (2)(7/3) = 7 1/3.

Now it's your turn.

Problems: 1. Find a cut design obeying the above three rules that minimizes the total length of the perimeters for five pieces.

For the rest of the problems, suppose we drop the child cut rule, but keep the first two (equal volume and vertical cut).

2. How much better can you do for five pieces in this case, assuming your cuts must be parallel to the original edges of the square?

3. What about for nine pieces under the same assumption? (Hint: there is a Russian doll feeling about this one.)

4. Try five pieces again if the cuts need not be parallel to the edges of the square.

The generalization to more pieces involves some elegant recurrences. If you are looking for a challenge, give it a try.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe