Gold in the Balance

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

An empty trough has a balance point at its center. When the trough is full, its balance point is again at the center. Very skilled goldsmiths will pour gold dust into the trough from the left end and moving to the right. They will pack it to the left as they pour so that the gold resembles a loaf of bread with the Leading Edge as the gold's rightmost line. Before the trough is full, the gold dust will cause the balance point to move to the left. Consider these images to help visualize the situation:

We are interested in the conditions when the balance point is farthest to the left. Let's call that farthest left balance point the Leftmost Balance Point.

Here are some questions for you to ponder.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Question 1. Without knowing the weight of the trough when empty or the density of the gold dust, when the balance point is at the Leftmost Balance Point, will the gold dust have filled more than half the trough (i.e. will the Leading Edge be to the right of the center)?

Question 2. When the balance point is at the Leftmost Balance Point, where is the Leading Edge relative to the Leftmost Balance Point?

Question 3. If the gold dust density can vary due to heavy impurities in the first gold dust that is poured in, how does your answer to question 2 change?

Question 4. Given that the gold dust has a density of 10 gram per linear centimeter for the height and width of the trough, and that the trough is 20 centimeters long and weighs 300 grams, where is the Leftmost Balance Point?

You have until November 21 to wrestle with this puzzle before we post the answers.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American