Cutting-Edge Experiments: Interfering Soccer Balls

This sidebar is part of a package that supplements our story on quantum erasure in the May issue of Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Physicists have now experimentally observed two-path quantum interference using many different particles, including electrons, neutrons, atoms and simple molecules. It's worth checking out this very nice movie of interference fringes for electrons showing up one at a time.

To date the largest objects observed to engage in this quantum jiggery pokery are molecules with 60 carbon atoms arranged like the pattern on a traditional soccer ball and 48 fluorine atoms coated on the surface of that sphere. This object, with a mass of 2.7 x 10-24 kg, is over a million times more massive than a single electron (10-30 kg). Admittedly it is still very small—less than a ten-billionth of the mass of the smallest cell in the human body (a sperm cell; 10-13 kg).

Perhaps even more amazing is the recent observation of interference of the biological molecule porphyrin, a key ingredient in chlorophyll and some blood cells. A porphyrin molecule in effect has several "wings" that can flop about as if joined to the rest of the molecule by hinges. That makes it very unlike an elementary particle such as an electron or even the carbon-60 molecules, which are quite rigid. See the section titled "The wave nature of biomolecules and fluorofullerenes" for more about the carbon-60 and porphyrin experiments.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


No one knows how large of an object can be made to interfere with itself. An experiment with carbon-70 molecules highlighted some of the difficulties. When the molecules were heated so that they were likely to emit infrared photons while they were passing through the slits, the contrast of the interference fringes decreased markedly. We can understand this perfectly using the concepts discussed in the main article: the emitted photons acted as which-path labelers, causing the interference to disappear. That is, in principle one could detect the photons and thereby ascertain which slit each molecule passed through. Remember, it's not necessary that anyone actually do that detecting—to destroy the interference it is enough that the photons simply exist.


More to Explore:

View the slideshow of quantum erasure in action

Discuss the experiment in the blog

What You Will Need For the Experiment

What Polarizers Do To Photons

How A Quantum Eraser Works

Notes on Polarizing Film

Troubleshooting the Experiment

More Experiments

Answer to the 3-Polarizer Puzzle Featured in the Print Edition

Whither Waves? More About Interference

Cutting-Edge Experiments: Interfering Soccer Balls

Delayed-Choice Experiments

What Do the Quantum Particles Really Do?

What is Being Erased?

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe