New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Cutting-Edge Experiments: Interfering Soccer Balls

This sidebar is part of a package that supplements our story on quantum erasure in the May issue of Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Physicists have now experimentally observed two-path quantum interference using many different particles, including electrons, neutrons, atoms and simple molecules. It's worth checking out this very nice movie of interference fringes for electrons showing up one at a time.

To date the largest objects observed to engage in this quantum jiggery pokery are molecules with 60 carbon atoms arranged like the pattern on a traditional soccer ball and 48 fluorine atoms coated on the surface of that sphere. This object, with a mass of 2.7 x 10-24 kg, is over a million times more massive than a single electron (10-30 kg). Admittedly it is still very small—less than a ten-billionth of the mass of the smallest cell in the human body (a sperm cell; 10-13 kg).

Perhaps even more amazing is the recent observation of interference of the biological molecule porphyrin, a key ingredient in chlorophyll and some blood cells. A porphyrin molecule in effect has several "wings" that can flop about as if joined to the rest of the molecule by hinges. That makes it very unlike an elementary particle such as an electron or even the carbon-60 molecules, which are quite rigid. See the section titled "The wave nature of biomolecules and fluorofullerenes" for more about the carbon-60 and porphyrin experiments.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


No one knows how large of an object can be made to interfere with itself. An experiment with carbon-70 molecules highlighted some of the difficulties. When the molecules were heated so that they were likely to emit infrared photons while they were passing through the slits, the contrast of the interference fringes decreased markedly. We can understand this perfectly using the concepts discussed in the main article: the emitted photons acted as which-path labelers, causing the interference to disappear. That is, in principle one could detect the photons and thereby ascertain which slit each molecule passed through. Remember, it's not necessary that anyone actually do that detecting—to destroy the interference it is enough that the photons simply exist.


More to Explore:

View the slideshow of quantum erasure in action

Discuss the experiment in the blog

What You Will Need For the Experiment

What Polarizers Do To Photons

How A Quantum Eraser Works

Notes on Polarizing Film

Troubleshooting the Experiment

More Experiments

Answer to the 3-Polarizer Puzzle Featured in the Print Edition

Whither Waves? More About Interference

Cutting-Edge Experiments: Interfering Soccer Balls

Delayed-Choice Experiments

What Do the Quantum Particles Really Do?

What is Being Erased?

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe