Quantum Leaps in Quantum Computing?

New “qubit” designs could enable more robust quantum machines

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Quantum computers can theoretically blow away conventional ones at solving important problems. But they face major hurdles: their basic computational units, called quantum bits or qubits, are difficult to control and are easily corrupted by heat or other environmental factors. Now researchers have designed two kinds of qubits that may help address these challenges.

Conventional computer bits represent either a one or a zero. But thanks to an eerie quantum effect known as superposition—which allows an atom, electron or other particle to exist in two or more states, such as “spinning” in opposite directions at once—a single qubit made of a particle in superposition can simultaneously encompass both digits. When multiple qubits become “entangled” (referring to a quantum property that links one particle's actions to those of its partners), computing capacity can rise exponentially with the number of qubits. In principle, a 300-qubit quantum computer could perform more calculations at once than there are atoms in the observable universe.

Credit: Brown Bird Design; Source: “Silicon Quantum Processor with Robust Long-Distance Qubit Couplings,” by Guilherme Tosi et al., in Nature Communications, Vol. 8, Article No. 450; September 6, 2017


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Currently qubits based on a particle's spin direction must be positioned about 15 nanometers apart—any more, and their entanglement fails. But quantum engineer Andrea Morello of the University of New South Wales in Australia and his colleagues now claim to have designed qubits that can be separated by up to 500 nanometers. This provides much more room for vital apparatus to control the qubits. To create one of these so-called flip-flop qubits (graphic), an electron is pulled some distance from an atom's nucleus. This causes the atom to exhibit positive and negative electric poles that can interact over relatively large distances, the researchers reported in September in Nature Communications.

Another proposed qubit design is based on “quasiparticles,” which are formed from negatively charged electrons interacting with positively charged “holes” in superconducting material. In work reported in August in Nature, scientists at the Delft University of Technology and Eindhoven University of Technology, both in the Netherlands, and their colleagues created structures in which a pair of separated quasiparticles can “braid,” or exchange places, acting as a single qubit. The distance between them would decrease the chance that environmental effects could perturb both particles at once, which potentially makes such qubits highly stable, says study co-lead author Hao Zhang, a quantum physicist at Delft.

Both teams say they hope to create working versions of the new qubits soon. “I think it's very exciting that scientists are still pursuing new roads to build large-scale quantum computers,” says quantum physicist Seth Lloyd of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who did not take part in either study.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 317 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Quantum Leaps” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 317 No. 6 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1217-16

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe