New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Quantum Leaps in Quantum Computing?

New “qubit” designs could enable more robust quantum machines

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Quantum computers can theoretically blow away conventional ones at solving important problems. But they face major hurdles: their basic computational units, called quantum bits or qubits, are difficult to control and are easily corrupted by heat or other environmental factors. Now researchers have designed two kinds of qubits that may help address these challenges.

Conventional computer bits represent either a one or a zero. But thanks to an eerie quantum effect known as superposition—which allows an atom, electron or other particle to exist in two or more states, such as “spinning” in opposite directions at once—a single qubit made of a particle in superposition can simultaneously encompass both digits. When multiple qubits become “entangled” (referring to a quantum property that links one particle's actions to those of its partners), computing capacity can rise exponentially with the number of qubits. In principle, a 300-qubit quantum computer could perform more calculations at once than there are atoms in the observable universe.

Credit: Brown Bird Design; Source: “Silicon Quantum Processor with Robust Long-Distance Qubit Couplings,” by Guilherme Tosi et al., in Nature Communications, Vol. 8, Article No. 450; September 6, 2017


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Currently qubits based on a particle's spin direction must be positioned about 15 nanometers apart—any more, and their entanglement fails. But quantum engineer Andrea Morello of the University of New South Wales in Australia and his colleagues now claim to have designed qubits that can be separated by up to 500 nanometers. This provides much more room for vital apparatus to control the qubits. To create one of these so-called flip-flop qubits (graphic), an electron is pulled some distance from an atom's nucleus. This causes the atom to exhibit positive and negative electric poles that can interact over relatively large distances, the researchers reported in September in Nature Communications.

Another proposed qubit design is based on “quasiparticles,” which are formed from negatively charged electrons interacting with positively charged “holes” in superconducting material. In work reported in August in Nature, scientists at the Delft University of Technology and Eindhoven University of Technology, both in the Netherlands, and their colleagues created structures in which a pair of separated quasiparticles can “braid,” or exchange places, acting as a single qubit. The distance between them would decrease the chance that environmental effects could perturb both particles at once, which potentially makes such qubits highly stable, says study co-lead author Hao Zhang, a quantum physicist at Delft.

Both teams say they hope to create working versions of the new qubits soon. “I think it's very exciting that scientists are still pursuing new roads to build large-scale quantum computers,” says quantum physicist Seth Lloyd of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who did not take part in either study.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 317 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Quantum Leaps” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 317 No. 6 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1217-16

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe