Quasars' Humble Roots Revealed

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Quasars have the distinction of being the brightest objects in the universe. As such, scientists surmised that they were most likely born out of large and tumultuous galaxies. But new findings from an international collaboration suggest that quasars can arise in humdrum galaxies much less intense than the Milky Way. "It¿s like finding a Formula One racing car in a suburban garage," notes team leader Scott Croom of the Anglo-Australian Observatory.

Using the Frederick C. Gillett Gemini North Telescope in Hawaii, astronomers studied nine galaxies, located about 10 billion light-years away from the earth, that host quasars. (The image above, of a quasar known as PKS 0637-72, was obtained using the Chandra X-ray Observatory.) "We¿d hoped their sizes and shapes might give clues as to what triggered quasar activity," Croom explains. But the researchers had trouble detecting the galaxies at all. Indeed, all but one were too faint or small to observe once the light from the quasar itself was accounted for.

Theory holds that quasars are powered by supermassive black holes that turn incoming matter into streams of radiation. Known supermassive black holes are associated with galaxies much larger than the ones analyzed in this study. Because the quasars examined in the new work formed when the universe was just four billion years old, they provide insight into how galaxies and black holes formed and evolved in the early universe. Notes team member David Schade of the Dominion Astrophysical Observatory in Victoria, B.C., "This finding is particularly exciting because it means that we may need to rethink our models of how quasars work." The results of this study were presented yesterday at the Gemini Science conference in Vancouver.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe