New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Quasars' Humble Roots Revealed

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Quasars have the distinction of being the brightest objects in the universe. As such, scientists surmised that they were most likely born out of large and tumultuous galaxies. But new findings from an international collaboration suggest that quasars can arise in humdrum galaxies much less intense than the Milky Way. "It¿s like finding a Formula One racing car in a suburban garage," notes team leader Scott Croom of the Anglo-Australian Observatory.

Using the Frederick C. Gillett Gemini North Telescope in Hawaii, astronomers studied nine galaxies, located about 10 billion light-years away from the earth, that host quasars. (The image above, of a quasar known as PKS 0637-72, was obtained using the Chandra X-ray Observatory.) "We¿d hoped their sizes and shapes might give clues as to what triggered quasar activity," Croom explains. But the researchers had trouble detecting the galaxies at all. Indeed, all but one were too faint or small to observe once the light from the quasar itself was accounted for.

Theory holds that quasars are powered by supermassive black holes that turn incoming matter into streams of radiation. Known supermassive black holes are associated with galaxies much larger than the ones analyzed in this study. Because the quasars examined in the new work formed when the universe was just four billion years old, they provide insight into how galaxies and black holes formed and evolved in the early universe. Notes team member David Schade of the Dominion Astrophysical Observatory in Victoria, B.C., "This finding is particularly exciting because it means that we may need to rethink our models of how quasars work." The results of this study were presented yesterday at the Gemini Science conference in Vancouver.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe