New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Radar Can Probe Soil's Structure

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Determining whether or not a swath of soil will lend itself to agricultural use usually requires extensive testing, which may disrupt the soil and can be time-consuming. Now a report published in the October 28 issue of Physical Review Letters outlines a quick, noninvasive way of estimating soil's suitability for planting. Researchers have used microwave radar to determine the physical and mechanical properties of a section of earth without disturbing it.

Klaudia Oleschko of the National Autonomous University of Mexico and her colleagues determined that although soil structure is extremely heterogeneous, on the scale of one centimeter to one meter it is also a fractal. That is, patterns that can be described with relatively simple equations are repeated over varying size scales. The scientists exploited this property to identify the volume of empty space--a good indicator of density and water content--within a sample of dirt. Microwaves reflected by a soil sample, the team found, had the same fractal dimensions as the sample itself. When the researchers used microwaves to scan a cube of earth with six very different layers (see image), the results obtained from the radar technique agreed well with direct measurements taken from each of the sections. The authors conclude that ground-penetrating radar is "a prominent tool for nondestructive soil studies."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe