Railroad Verdict

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Coroner's Jury, in the case of the Providence and Worcester Railroad collision, noticed by us last week, have brought in a verdict thus : " the said accident was the immediate result of culpable carelessness, inexperience, and want of judgment of F. W. Putnam, the conductor of the Uxbridge train." This man is quite young, had a poor borrowed watch, and had only $30 per month of wages. The Company showing,by their liberality, the care they had for passengers' lives. The jury also decided that " the whole management of the trains on said road was bad, and that there was no necessity for one crowding upon the time of another." We hope the managers of this railroad will be made to pay for their mis management

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 50This article was published with the title “Railroad Verdict” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 50 (), p. 396
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican08271853-396i

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe