Railway Curves

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The "Charleston Mercury" has some excellent remarks about railway curves, and points out the danger and absurdity of constructing so many curves upon Bomeiam uu ". It says :— "In the low and middle country of the South these mischievous meanderings of railroads are quite inexcusable. They are never necessary, and in their effects, they form one of the most fruitful sources of expense in the working of the roads. They lengthen the running distance, and thus cause a loss of time to every train. They increase this loss by checking speed. The curved track wears out much faster, and it tears and wrenches the rolling stock. Add to this that every abrupt curve, by concealing the track, becomes a trap for the trains, and will, in all probability, in the ordinary period of a charter, cost the compariy three times as much in repairs and accidents, as was saved in the first construction. We have felt that, at this time, when so many railroads are in progress in our own and the neighboring States, this point couhi not be too strongly pressed on the attention of their managers. Railroads are not temporary expedients—they are meant for the use of all future generations, and are expected to be the most enduring, as well as the grandest monuments of the enterprize and forecast ot our age. Let them be built in a manner worthy of their destined office, as the great arterial system of the industrial world,—the bond ot union, and. the beneficent minister to . the wants of the races of men." These remarks we hope will not be lost i upon our Southern and Western railroad companies. We have a country in which straight ' and level railroads can be built at less ex- ( pense than they can in any other country on the lace of this globe. Air lines, level and double track railroads, and no others should be built.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 31This article was published with the title “Railway Curves” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 31 (), p. 248
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican04161853-248e

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe