Rain Forests Release Carbon Dioxide in Response to Warmer Temperatures

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Because forests can absorb carbon dioxide (CO₂) produced by the burning of fossil fuels, they have been labeled carbon sinks. But as the global atmospheric burden of CO₂ continues to rise, scientists are realizing that the situation may not be quite so cut-and-dried. According to a report published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, increasing temperatures could cause rain forests to release unusually high levels of CO₂, thereby amplifying the effects of future warming.

Deborah A. Clark of the University of Missouri-St. Louis and her colleagues measured the annual growth of six species of trees in an old-growth rain forest in La Selva, Costa Rica, between 1984 and 2000. The researchers also used data from global climate monitoring stations to calculate CO₂ emissions from tropical lands over the same time period. Tree growth and the amount of carbon dioxide exchange both varied greatly over the 16-year period, and both were correlated with temperature. In addition, during the warmest years--particularly the record-breaking 1997-1998 El Nino episode--the rain-forest trees experienced the least growth and expelled the most carbon dioxide, the scientists report. They conclude that the carbon balance of the La Selva rain forest is remarkably sensitive to increasing temperatures. Tropical rain forests could thus potentially induce a large positive feedback for global CO₂ atmospheric accumulation. Note the authors: "Such a feedback in future years would accelerate global warming."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American