Rainbow Cells

Biodiversity was the first step toward complex life

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Witnesses were absent for the comings and goings of the first life some four billion years ago, but scientists are pretty sure the typical Earth creature in those days consisted of no more than a single cell. That doesn't mean the planet was a dull sea of sameness. Single-celled creatures may have acquired genetic diversity early on.

Here's why. When cells divide, mistakes have a way of creeping into genetic material. Variants that enhance a cell's ability to survive and reproduce become more common over successive generations. This basic fact of evolution applied to the early Earth. “Variation is necessary for there to be evolution by natural selection in the first place,” explains Andrew Hamilton, a philosopher of science at Arizona State University. “Biodiversity originated at the point that there was variation on which selection could operate.”

Today we think of biodiversity in terms of multicellular life, but flowering plants and animals didn't arrive until relatively recently (540 million years ago). Although some evidence suggests that having a wide variety of species makes an ecosystem more stable, the jury is still out. It is of no comfort to know that the worst catastrophe would still preserve some biodiversity—even if only for the lowly cell.

Melinda Wenner Moyer, a contributing editor at Scientific American, is author of Hello, Cruel World! Science-Based Strategies for Raising Terrific Kids in Terrifying Times (G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 2025).

More by Melinda Wenner Moyer
Scientific American Magazine Vol 303 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Rainbow Cells” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 303 No. 2 (), p. 53
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0810-53a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe