New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Rainbow Cells

Biodiversity was the first step toward complex life

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Witnesses were absent for the comings and goings of the first life some four billion years ago, but scientists are pretty sure the typical Earth creature in those days consisted of no more than a single cell. That doesn't mean the planet was a dull sea of sameness. Single-celled creatures may have acquired genetic diversity early on.

Here's why. When cells divide, mistakes have a way of creeping into genetic material. Variants that enhance a cell's ability to survive and reproduce become more common over successive generations. This basic fact of evolution applied to the early Earth. “Variation is necessary for there to be evolution by natural selection in the first place,” explains Andrew Hamilton, a philosopher of science at Arizona State University. “Biodiversity originated at the point that there was variation on which selection could operate.”

Today we think of biodiversity in terms of multicellular life, but flowering plants and animals didn't arrive until relatively recently (540 million years ago). Although some evidence suggests that having a wide variety of species makes an ecosystem more stable, the jury is still out. It is of no comfort to know that the worst catastrophe would still preserve some biodiversity—even if only for the lowly cell.

Melinda Wenner Moyer, a contributing editor at Scientific American, is author of Hello, Cruel World! Science-Based Strategies for Raising Terrific Kids in Terrifying Times (G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 2025).

More by Melinda Wenner Moyer
Scientific American Magazine Vol 303 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Rainbow Cells” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 303 No. 2 (), p. 53
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0810-53a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe