Random Movements Help Humans Balance

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


With some practice, it's not that hard to balance a baseball bat on the end of your finger. But try to poise a pen or a short stick, and the task becomes rather difficult. That's because a smaller object moves more quickly--at speeds that approach the time required to carry out corrective motions. Now findings published in the October 7 issue of Physical Review Letters suggest that random movements induced by the nervous system can help keep a stick balanced on a fingertip.

Juan L. Cabrera and John G. Milton of the University of Chicago placed reflective tape on the ends of a rod and filmed a person trying to balance it. By analyzing how light bounced off the bar, the scientists determined that the stick's quivers lasted between 10 milliseconds and one second. But 98 percent of the subject's adjusting movements occurred faster than the average reaction time for such a task, suggesting that the person wasn't controlling the stabilizing actions. When Cabrera and Milton devised a mathematical equation to describe the motion, complete with a random component, it fit well with their observations of a stick on the verge of falling over. Scientists have introduced such random movement into high-performance aircraft to increase stability. The fact that humans benefit from randomness too, the authors say, suggests that researchers might want to incorporate it into designs for more lifelike walking robotics.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe