New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Random Movements Help Humans Balance

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


With some practice, it's not that hard to balance a baseball bat on the end of your finger. But try to poise a pen or a short stick, and the task becomes rather difficult. That's because a smaller object moves more quickly--at speeds that approach the time required to carry out corrective motions. Now findings published in the October 7 issue of Physical Review Letters suggest that random movements induced by the nervous system can help keep a stick balanced on a fingertip.

Juan L. Cabrera and John G. Milton of the University of Chicago placed reflective tape on the ends of a rod and filmed a person trying to balance it. By analyzing how light bounced off the bar, the scientists determined that the stick's quivers lasted between 10 milliseconds and one second. But 98 percent of the subject's adjusting movements occurred faster than the average reaction time for such a task, suggesting that the person wasn't controlling the stabilizing actions. When Cabrera and Milton devised a mathematical equation to describe the motion, complete with a random component, it fit well with their observations of a stick on the verge of falling over. Scientists have introduced such random movement into high-performance aircraft to increase stability. The fact that humans benefit from randomness too, the authors say, suggests that researchers might want to incorporate it into designs for more lifelike walking robotics.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe