Rapid Antarctic Ice Melt in the Past Bodes Ill for the Future

Geological evidence shows glaciers retreated by as much as 6 miles in a year at the end of the last ice age

A new iceberg calves from Pine Island Glacier—one of the main outlets where the West Antarctic Ice Sheet flows into the ocean, in September 2017.

Antarctic glaciers may be capable of shrinking at much faster rates than scientists previously imagined — raising new concerns about the future of the ice sheet.

New evidence suggests that parts of the ice sheet retreated by as much as 6 miles a year at the end of the last ice age, around 11,000 years ago. That's about 10 times as fast as the fastest-melting glaciers are retreating today.

It's an ominous reminder that previous warm periods have driven monumental environmental changes — and it's possible it could happen again.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"This is the first study that's showed definitively that rates [of retreat] can be this rapid," said lead author Julian Dowdeswell, director of the Scott Polar Research Institute at the University of Cambridge.

The study, published yesterday in Science, used a robotic underwater vehicle to investigate the seabed around the eastern Antarctic Peninsula. The vehicle revealed a pattern of ridges on the ocean floor, perfectly preserved for thousands of years.

These kinds of ridges can form as a glacier loses ice and retreats backward into the ice sheet.

Researchers believe ocean tides are a key part of the process. When the tide comes in, it rocks the glacier and ever-so-slightly lifts the ice from the bottom of the ocean. When the tide goes back out, the ice settles back into place.

A stable glacier will lift up and set down again in the exact same spot. But a glacier that's steadily losing ice will retreat backward, just a bit, each time the tide comes in and out. The result is a pattern of lines in the seafloor, marking how the ice has moved backward over time.

This explanation — relying on ocean tides as a pace-setter — is commonly accepted in the research community, according to Martin Jakobsson of Stockholm University, who published a comment on the new research in Science this week.

Assuming this is what was happening, the pattern suggests the ice in this region was retreating by 40 to 50 meters each day. Over an entire year, that would come to more than 10 kilometers, or at least 6 miles.

The researchers believe the high rates of retreat probably would have lasted no more than a few years before restabilizing.

Still, compared with present-day estimates of glacier retreat, it's an eyebrow-raising figure.

By contrast, Pine Island Glacier — one of the fastest-melting glaciers in Antarctica today — has retreated at a rate of just over a kilometer per year for the past few decades.

The new study doesn't prove exactly what processes were physically driving the retreat 11,000 years ago. It demonstrates that extremely rapid retreat is possible but doesn't explain what conditions are necessary for this to happen.

Dowdeswell said he believes the circumstances today might be similar to what was going on at the end of the last ice age.

Today, scientists believe that currents of warm ocean water are helping to melt Antarctica's fastest-melting glaciers from the bottom up. The warm water seeps beneath the ice shelves at the edges of the glaciers, causing them to thin and destabilize.

"The circumstances of ice shelf systems thinning were likely to be similar 11,000 or 12,000 years ago," Dowdeswell said.

But without a proven explanation for what was happening, the new study "presents a challenge for the ice-modeling community," Jakobsson wrote.

Scientists rely on models to help them predict how glaciers may behave in the future, such as when and where ice melt may begin to speed up and how much sea levels will rise in response.

But ice models are notoriously difficult to build, in large part because scientists still are scratching the surface of how ice sheets physically respond to climate change.

In recent years, multiple studies have begun to suggest that previous projections about sea-level rise may have been too low — that the world's ice sheets may melt at faster rates than previously predicted.

The new study would seem to add to these anxieties, Dowdeswell noted. It suggests that former estimates "don't encompass the full variability and full rapidity of the rates of retreat that can take place," he said.

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news at www.eenews.net.

Chelsea Harvey covers climate science for Climatewire. She tracks the big questions being asked by researchers and explains what's known, and what needs to be, about global temperatures. Chelsea began writing about climate science in 2014. Her work has appeared in The Washington Post, Popular Science, Men's Journal and others.

More by Chelsea Harvey

E&E News provides essential energy and environment news for professionals.

More by E&E News

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe